This study guide assignment will count double (17 points for SG13 and 17 points for SG14). You do not submit for SG13. Instead, once SG14-420-345 is graded we will duplicate the points into the SG13 assignment for you. Start your work with a sort section labeled Summary with a summary and justification of your design choices. f you create your own decorative or content images (not required), include how you created them in this summary section. You may not use figures from our book or other sources for content unless you make them your own and cite them. This is so you learn the content, not just make a submission. Second, include a labeled Contemplation section on what you learned this week from doing your creation and from your feedback from the previous SG assignment. Create a representation of physiology that will be your study guide for these weeks. Major topics to represent include Describe the digestive system from the perspective of motility, digestion, absorption, and secretion. Describe the digestive system from the perspective of the three phases, cephalic, gastric and intestinal. Compare and contrast the metabolism in the fed state to the metabolism in the fasted state. Pick two of the sections of the endocrine chapter from the four modules of cortisol, thyroid hormones, growth hormone, and calcium regulation. State which two you selected. Compare and contrast the two components of the endocrine system that you selected. Include in-text citations throughout your work and at the end of your work include a Work Cited section. You need in-text citations for any direct quote (6-7 or more words from any source, or an image), and for paraphrasing anything other than our textbook and lectures. Include the full citations in Works cited for all sources, including paraphrasing the textbook. Review the rubric for the seven criteria – correct, complete, clear, connected, creative, contemplative, and constructive criticism. For constructive criticism credit be sure to submit on time and complete your peer reviews by 11:59 pm on the Thursday after the submission deadline. Your assigned reviews should appear in your To Do list in Canvas. Rubric The Seven C’s of Constructing Knowledge (12) The Seven C’s of Constructing Knowledge (12) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Correct 2 pts Exceeds Expectations It is hard to exceed expectations for being correct. More points can be earned elsewhere. 2 pts Meets Expectations The work has zero to one factual errors. It is okay to make errors as you learn, but be sure to fix them when you can. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The work has two or more factual errors. It is okay to make errors as you learn, but try to develop strategies to check your work before you submit. Talk to your LA. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Complete 2 pts Exceeds Expectations The work includes information on more of the learning objectives for the week than were required. 2 pts Meets Expectations The work includes nearly all of the necessary information for the whole learning objective for the assignment. May be missing one or two terms or minor concepts. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The work is missing a major concept, or more than two minor concepts or terms. Check in with your team and LA as you work to make sure you are complete. Read the instructions carefully. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clear 2 pts Exceeds Expectations It is hard to exceed expectations for being clear, but it is possible if you make something easier to understand than usual. 2 pts Meets Expectations The work can be understood by a typical Wayne State undergraduate student, or you explain in your summary and justification why it would be clear to a subset of them. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The work is not understandable to a typical WSU student, and there is no justification for how it would work for even a subset of the students. Check in with your team and LA more on next assignment. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Connected 2 pts Exceeds Expectations This work makes many strong connections between the objective for this week and the creator’s life and/or prior knowledge. 2 pts Meets Expectations The work includes connections between the objective for this week and either the creator’s life or prior knowledge from this course or beyond. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations This work is not connected to the creator’s life or prior knowledge. Take some time to compare your work to your work from previous weeks to make connections. Start with terms that appear repeatedly. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Creative 2 pts Exceeds Expectations The work is exceptionally unique. It is unusual, effective, and memorable in presentation, content or how it makes connections. 2 pts Meets Expectations The work is a unique expression of the objective. It may be a traditional form, like paragraphs, with information arranged in unique ways; or the format may be unique. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The work does not stand out as original. Consider taking a risk for the next assignment. A good first step is thinking about how the parts fit together for you, not just how they are presented in the book or lectures. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Constructive Feedback 2 pts Exceeds Expectations The student met expectations and gave more constructive feedback to others than expected. 2 pts Meets Expectations The student did two peer reviews, and engaged in ongoing team discussions, including posting work or ideas in time for feedback, and replying at least twice in the team Discussions board. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The student missed one or two of the peer reviews, or did not engage sufficiently in ongoing discussions of work-in-progress in their team area this week. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Contemplative 2 pts Exceeds Expectations The reflection statement describes making a particularly big change to the work based on feedback or personal reflection. 2 pts Meets Expectations The reflection statement describes continuous improvement through incorporation of feedback or ideas into the work. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The reflection statement is missing or does not describe incorporating feedback or reflection into the work; or the stated changes are not apparent in the work. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Exceeds Expectations When you exceed expectations Exceeds will be marked for that category, but the points are the same as meeting expectations. This item allows us to add the exceeds points to your grade. 3 pts Exceeds Expectations You exceeded expectations in one or more categories. See the categories above to determine which one. 0 pts Did Not Exceed Expectations You did not exceed expectations this time. Check the other items in the rubric for ways to exceed expectations. 3 pts Total Points: 17 Previous Next