Legal Research paper on business law topic – Autonomous Driving Vehicles “Conduct legal research using library resources, academic journals, and reviews, publications e.g., Wall Street Journal, Barons, Business Week, Harvard Business Review, online resources, and interviews.  No WIKIPEDIA, textbook, or Griffis lecture references or citations, I want original verifiable research and cited authorities.” Open Ended Essay prompt from professor Use the the IRAC format if applicable. (IRAC Explanation below”)   “IRAC” is the analytical foundation for B-Law Legal Scholars. “I” states the Issue (aka “question of law” presented); “R” is the Rule of law that governs the issue in dispute; “A” is your Application of the rule to the issue presented; “C” is your Conclusion.         Example: Embattled rapper Busta Rhymes is in trouble again — this time for allegedly bustin’ a fan in the head. Roberto LeBron filed a lawsuit in Manhattan Superior Court alleging that Rhymes — whose real name is Trevor Smith [you gotta’ be kidding, Busta’s real name is TREVOR??] — and a posse of nine bodyguards roughed him up and kicked him in the head after a concert last summer.    1. Read and re-read the case to understand the questions presented. Identify the plaintiff and defendant and the issues presented. Write a brief summary of the facts. Then begin IRAC. Here, Roberto LeBron is the plaintiff; Busta is the defendant.     2. State the first “I” presented. An issue is really a conclusion of law framed by the application of a legal rule which is of itself determinative of the legal outcome. For instance, one Issue is whether Busta committed a battery when he “busta” Roberto LeBron in the head.  3. Next, identify the “R” that applies to the issue. Rules have elements that must be satisfied. In the battery context, Roberto must prove that: (a) Busta intentionally touched him in a hostile or offensive manner; and (b) that the touching was unprivileged (no consent). State any defenses, i.e. consent; and counter-defenses, i.e. the touching went beyond the consent given. 4. “A” is merely applying the facts of the case to the rules of law. Make it easy on yourself, divide the “A” portion of your brief (a) Busta struck Roberto’s head, striking another’s head is a hostile and offensive touching; (b) Roberto did not consent to being hit; (c) [defense 1] hostile touching is expected at Busta Rhymes concerts (???).   5. State your “C” in the last paragraph. “Busta Rhymes is likely to be found guilty of battery”.