House of Seventy-Two Tenants  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elWEFDqTf7s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92wLqdF_xKA https://www.lovehkfilm.com/reviews_2/house_of_72_tenants.htm feedback from the last assignment: Please cite the author and the paper title properly. The conclusion is incoherent with the previous analysis and requires further explanation.  Reading is in the file LTEA 120C: Hong Kong Films Instructions on Assignments • Purpose: to cultivate the habits of critical reading by making arguments and providing evidence • Content: identify an argument (not merely a topic) from a required reading (with direct quotations and page numbers) and discuss it in relation to the designated film of the day • Focus: your ability to articulate someone else’ argument and state your interpretation of a film in relation to that argument; mere factual information or plot summary won’t count as argument • Length: 1 double-space page or 350 words for each short paper; the portion in excess of the limit will not be graded for credit • Grading: out of 10 points for each commentary, 3 for identification of an argument and logical transition, 3 points for film discussion focused on details, and 4 for writing (grammar, expression, coherence, style)  Commentary Template SAMPLE 1: the critic’s argument first   Film Title (year) addresses the issue of … Scholar (name of the chapter author, not the volume editor) argues that “…” (page number). I agree (or disagree) with this argument because … In the film, I see … (details) and interpret … (your analysis). This scene (example) shows … (back to the issue/argument stated earlier).     SAMPLE 2: your argument first   Film Title (year) addresses the issue of … In the film, I see … (details) and interpret … (your analysis). My argument is supported by Scholar (name of the chapter, not the editor), who observes that “…” (page number). A sentence or two to bring this quote to your discussion and argument and then conclude.   * You only need to quote from 1 reading and address 1 issue/argument. Try to grade yourself using this scale: out of 10 points for each commentary, 3 for identification of an argument and logical transition, 3 points for film discussion focused on details, and 4 for writing (grammar, expression, coherence, style)